Re: [PATCH 026/119] xfs: add owner field to extent allocation and freeing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:01:20PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:20:39PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > For the rmap btree to work, we have to feed the extent owner
> > information to the the allocation and freeing functions. This
> > information is what will end up in the rmap btree that tracks
> > allocated extents. While we technically don't need the owner
> > information when freeing extents, passing it allows us to validate
> > that the extent we are removing from the rmap btree actually
> > belonged to the owner we expected it to belong to.
> ....
> 
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_format.h
> > @@ -1318,6 +1318,71 @@ typedef __be32 xfs_inobt_ptr_t;
> >   */
> >  #define	XFS_RMAP_CRC_MAGIC	0x524d4233	/* 'RMB3' */
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Ownership info for an extent.  This is used to create reverse-mapping
> > + * entries.
> > + */
> > +#define XFS_OWNER_INFO_ATTR_FORK	(1 << 0)
> > +#define XFS_OWNER_INFO_BMBT_BLOCK	(1 << 1)
> > +struct xfs_owner_info {
> > +	uint64_t		oi_owner;
> > +	xfs_fileoff_t		oi_offset;
> > +	unsigned int		oi_flags;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +xfs_rmap_ag_owner(
> > +	struct xfs_owner_info	*oi,
> > +	uint64_t		owner)
> > +{
> > +	oi->oi_owner = owner;
> > +	oi->oi_offset = 0;
> > +	oi->oi_flags = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +xfs_rmap_ino_bmbt_owner(
> > +	struct xfs_owner_info	*oi,
> > +	xfs_ino_t		ino,
> > +	int			whichfork)
> > +{
> > +	oi->oi_owner = ino;
> > +	oi->oi_offset = 0;
> > +	oi->oi_flags = XFS_OWNER_INFO_BMBT_BLOCK;
> > +	if (whichfork == XFS_ATTR_FORK)
> > +		oi->oi_flags |= XFS_OWNER_INFO_ATTR_FORK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void
> > +xfs_rmap_ino_owner(
> > +	struct xfs_owner_info	*oi,
> > +	xfs_ino_t		ino,
> > +	int			whichfork,
> > +	xfs_fileoff_t		offset)
> > +{
> > +	oi->oi_owner = ino;
> > +	oi->oi_offset = offset;
> > +	oi->oi_flags = 0;
> > +	if (whichfork == XFS_ATTR_FORK)
> > +		oi->oi_flags |= XFS_OWNER_INFO_ATTR_FORK;
> > +}
> 
> One of the things we've avaoided doing so far is putting functions
> like this into xfs_format.h. xfs_format.h is really just for the
> on disk format definitions, not the code to access/pack/unpack it.
> Hence I think think these sorts of functions need to be moved to
> xfs_rmap.h....

Yes.

I've already split xfs_rmap_btree.h into xfs_rmap.h (high level rmap
functions) and xfs_rmap_btree.h (low level btree functions) for the
realtime rmapbt code split.  Won't be difficult to move these over
from xfs_format.h.

Speaking of which, I've pushed that along to the point that the
kernel-side implementation is at pre-alpha eatmydata stage, check
works well enough that xfstests doesn't explode, and we can collect
rt rmaps for checking and rebuilding of the tree.  I'll try to finish
that tomorrow.

--D

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> 
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux