Re: [RFC PATCH] coredump: avoid ext4 auto_da_alloc for core file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:42:13AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/coredump.c b/fs/coredump.c
> > index 281b768000e6..9da7357773f0 100644
> > --- a/fs/coredump.c
> > +++ b/fs/coredump.c
> > @@ -741,8 +741,10 @@ void do_coredump(const siginfo_t *siginfo)
> >  			goto close_fail;
> >  		if (!(cprm.file->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_WRITE))
> >  			goto close_fail;
> > -		if (do_truncate(cprm.file->f_path.dentry, 0, 0, cprm.file))
> > -			goto close_fail;
> > +		if (i_size_read(file_inode(cprm.file)) != 0) {
> > +			if (do_truncate(cprm.file->f_path.dentry, 0, 0, cprm.file))
> > +				goto close_fail;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> > 
> >  	/* get us an unshared descriptor table; almost always a no-op */
> > 
> 
> Omar, this probably breaks the case where we do
> fallocate(FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE), the i_size will be 0 but there will be
> blocks to truncate.  Probably want to check i_blocks or something.  Thanks,

Sure, but this is in the coredump code; do we care there?  What are
the odds that someone will have fallocated blocks beyond i_size in a
file named "core"?  And if so, it's not like it's going to make the
coredump invalid or non-useful in any way.

      	       	     	 	  	      - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux