On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 01:31:10PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 02:22:48AM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>
> > > + if (!(open_flags & O_CREAT) && !d_unhashed(dentry)) {
>
> s/d_unhashed/d_in_lookup/ in that.
>
> > So we come racing here from multiple threads (say 3 or more - we have seen this
> > in the older crash reports, so totally possible)
> >
> > > + d_drop(dentry);
> >
> > One lucky one does this first before the others perform the !d_unhashed check above.
> > This makes the other ones to not enter here.
> >
> > And we are back to the original problem of multiple threads trying to instantiate
> > same dentry as before.
>
> Yep. See above - it should've been using d_in_lookup() in the first place,
> through the entire nfs_atomic_open(). Same in the Lustre part of fixes,
> obviously.
See current #for-linus for hopefully fixed variants (both lustre and nfs)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
