On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:26:49AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Christoph, it look slike there's an ENOSPC+ENOMEM behavioural regression here. > generic/224 on my 1p/1GB RAM VM using a 1k lock size filesystem has > significantly different behaviour once ENOSPC is hit withi this patchset. > > It ends up with an endless stream of errors like this: I've spent some time trying to reproduce this. I'm actually getting the OOM killer almost reproducible for for-next without the iomap patches as well when just using 1GB of mem. 1400 MB is the minimum I can reproducibly finish the test with either code base. But with the 1400 MB setup I see a few interesting things. Even with the baseline, no-iomap case I see a few errors in the log: [ 70.407465] Filesystem "vdc": reserve blocks depleted! Consider increasing reserve pool size. [ 70.195645] XFS (vdc): page discard on page ffff88005682a988, inode 0xd3, offset 761856. [ 70.408079] Buffer I/O error on dev vdc, logical block 1048513, lost async page write [ 70.408598] Buffer I/O error on dev vdc, logical block 1048514, lost async page write 27s With iomap I also see the spew of page discard errors your see, but while I see a lot of them, the rest still finishes after a reasonable time, just a few seconds more than the pre-iomap baseline. I also see the reserve block depleted message in this case. Digging into the reserve block depleted message - it seems we have too many parallel iomap_allocate transactions going on. I suspect this might be because the writeback code will not finish a writeback context if we have multiple blocks inside a page, which can happen easily for this 1k ENOSPC setup. I've not had time to fully check if this is what really happens, but I did a quick hack (see below) to only allocate 1k at a time in iomap_begin, and with that generic/224 finishes without the warning spew. Of course this isn't a real fix, and I need to fully understand what's going on in writeback due to different allocation / dirtying patterns from the iomap change. diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c index 620fc91..d9afba2 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ xfs_file_iomap_begin( * Note that the values needs to be less than 32-bits wide until * the lower level functions are updated. */ - length = min_t(loff_t, length, 1024 * PAGE_SIZE); + length = min_t(loff_t, length, 1024); if (xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) { /* * xfs_iomap_write_direct() expects the shared lock. It -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html