On Saturday, June 25, 2016 2:37:24 PM CEST Deepa Dinamani wrote: > The series is aimed at getting rid of CURRENT_TIME, CURRENT_TIME_SEC macros > and replacing current_fs_time() with current_time(). > The macros are not y2038 safe. There is no plan to transition them into being > y2038 safe. > ktime_get_* api's can be used in their place. And, these are y2038 safe. > > CURRENT_TIME will be deleted after 4.8 rc1 as there is a dependency function > time64_to_tm() for one of the CURRENT_TIME occurance. > > Thanks to Arnd Bergmann for all the guidance and discussions. > > Patches 3-5 were mostly generated using coccinelle. > > All filesystem timestamps use current_fs_time() for right granularity as > mentioned in the respective commit texts of patches. This has a changed > signature, renamed to current_time() and moved to the fs/inode.c. > > This series also serves as a preparatory series to transition vfs to 64 bit > timestamps as outlined here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/12/104 . > > As per Linus's suggestion in https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/663 , all the > inode timestamp changes have been squashed into a single patch. Also, > current_time() now is used as a single generic vfs filesystem timestamp api. > It also takes struct inode* as argument instead of struct super_block*. > Posting all patches together in a bigger series so that the big picture is > clear. > > As per the suggestion in https://lwn.net/Articles/672598/, CURRENT_TIME macro > bug fixes are being handled in a series separate from transitioning vfs to use. > Everything in this version looks good to me. Please add Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> and send a pull request to Al Viro, based on the latest linux-4.7-rc release. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
