Re: Internal error xfs_trans_cancel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02.06.2016 15:29, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> Hmmm, Ok. I've been running the lockperf test and kernel builds all
>> day on a filesystem that is identical in shape and size to yours
>> (i.e. xfs_info output is the same) but I haven't reproduced it yet.
> I don't know if that is important: I run the lockperf test and after
> they have finished I do a kernel build.
> 
>> Is it possible to get a metadump image of your filesystem to see if
>> I can reproduce it on that?
> Sure, see private mail.

Dave, Daniel, what's the latest status on this issue? It made it to my
list of know 4.7 regressions after Christoph suggested it should be
listed. But this thread looks stalled, as afaics nothing happened for
three weeks apart from Josh (added to CC) mentioning he also saw it. Or
is this discussed elsewhere? Or fixed already?

Sincerely, your regression tracker for Linux 4.7 (http://bit.ly/28JRmJo)
 Thorsten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux