On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:19:15PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On a filesystem with both reflink and reverse mapping enabled, it's
> possible to have multiple rmap records referring to the same blocks on
> disk. When overlapping intervals are possible, querying a classic
> btree to find all records intersecting a given interval is inefficient
> because we cannot use the left side of the search interval to filter
> out non-matching records the same way that we can use the existing
> btree key to filter out records coming after the right side of the
> search interval. This will become important once we want to use the
> rmap btree to rebuild BMBTs, or implement the (future) fsmap ioctl.
>
> (For the non-overlapping case, we can perform such queries trivially
> by starting at the left side of the interval and walking the tree
> until we pass the right side.)
>
> Therefore, extend the btree code to come closer to supporting
> intervals as a first-class record attribute. This involves widening
> the btree node's key space to store both the lowest key reachable via
> the node pointer (as the btree does now) and the highest key reachable
> via the same pointer and teaching the btree modifying functions to
> keep the highest-key records up to date.
>
> This behavior can be turned on via a new btree ops flag so that btrees
> that cannot store overlapping intervals don't pay the overhead costs
> in terms of extra code and disk format changes.
>
> v2: When we're deleting a record in a btree that supports overlapped
> interval records and the deletion results in two btree blocks being
> joined, we defer updating the high/low keys until after all possible
> joining (at higher levels in the tree) have finished. At this point,
> the btree pointers at all levels have been updated to remove the empty
> blocks and we can update the low and high keys.
>
> When we're doing this, we must be careful to update the keys of all
> node pointers up to the root instead of stopping at the first set of
> keys that don't need updating. This is because it's possible for a
> single deletion to cause joining of multiple levels of tree, and so
> we need to update everything going back to the root.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
I think I get the gist of this and it mostly looks Ok to me. A few
questions and minor comments...
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c | 379 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h | 16 ++
> fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h | 36 ++++
> 3 files changed, 395 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> index a096539..afcafd6 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,11 @@ static const __uint32_t xfs_magics[2][XFS_BTNUM_MAX] = {
> xfs_magics[!!((cur)->bc_flags & XFS_BTREE_CRC_BLOCKS)][cur->bc_btnum]
>
>
> +struct xfs_btree_double_key {
> + union xfs_btree_key low;
> + union xfs_btree_key high;
> +};
> +
> STATIC int /* error (0 or EFSCORRUPTED) */
> xfs_btree_check_lblock(
> struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, /* btree cursor */
> @@ -428,6 +433,30 @@ xfs_btree_dup_cursor(
> * into a btree block (xfs_btree_*_offset) or return a pointer to the given
> * record, key or pointer (xfs_btree_*_addr). Note that all addressing
> * inside the btree block is done using indices starting at one, not zero!
> + *
> + * If XFS_BTREE_OVERLAPPING is set, then this btree supports keys containing
> + * overlapping intervals. In such a tree, records are still sorted lowest to
> + * highest and indexed by the smallest key value that refers to the record.
> + * However, nodes are different: each pointer has two associated keys -- one
> + * indexing the lowest key available in the block(s) below (the same behavior
> + * as the key in a regular btree) and another indexing the highest key
> + * available in the block(s) below. Because records are /not/ sorted by the
> + * highest key, all leaf block updates require us to compute the highest key
> + * that matches any record in the leaf and to recursively update the high keys
> + * in the nodes going further up in the tree, if necessary. Nodes look like
> + * this:
> + *
> + * +--------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-------+-------+-----+
> + * Non-Leaf: | header | lo1 | hi1 | lo2 | hi2 | ... | ptr 1 | ptr 2 | ... |
> + * +--------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-------+-------+-----+
> + *
> + * To perform an interval query on an overlapped tree, perform the usual
> + * depth-first search and use the low and high keys to decide if we can skip
> + * that particular node. If a leaf node is reached, return the records that
> + * intersect the interval. Note that an interval query may return numerous
> + * entries. For a non-overlapped tree, simply search for the record associated
> + * with the lowest key and iterate forward until a non-matching record is
> + * found.
> */
>
> /*
> @@ -445,6 +474,17 @@ static inline size_t xfs_btree_block_len(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur)
> return XFS_BTREE_SBLOCK_LEN;
> }
>
> +/* Return size of btree block keys for this btree instance. */
> +static inline size_t xfs_btree_key_len(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur)
> +{
> + size_t len;
> +
> + len = cur->bc_ops->key_len;
> + if (cur->bc_ops->flags & XFS_BTREE_OPS_OVERLAPPING)
> + len *= 2;
> + return len;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Return size of btree block pointers for this btree instance.
> */
> @@ -475,7 +515,19 @@ xfs_btree_key_offset(
> int n)
> {
> return xfs_btree_block_len(cur) +
> - (n - 1) * cur->bc_ops->key_len;
> + (n - 1) * xfs_btree_key_len(cur);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Calculate offset of the n-th high key in a btree block.
> + */
> +STATIC size_t
> +xfs_btree_high_key_offset(
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + int n)
> +{
> + return xfs_btree_block_len(cur) +
> + (n - 1) * xfs_btree_key_len(cur) + cur->bc_ops->key_len;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -488,7 +540,7 @@ xfs_btree_ptr_offset(
> int level)
> {
> return xfs_btree_block_len(cur) +
> - cur->bc_ops->get_maxrecs(cur, level) * cur->bc_ops->key_len +
> + cur->bc_ops->get_maxrecs(cur, level) * xfs_btree_key_len(cur) +
> (n - 1) * xfs_btree_ptr_len(cur);
> }
>
> @@ -519,6 +571,19 @@ xfs_btree_key_addr(
> }
>
> /*
> + * Return a pointer to the n-th high key in the btree block.
> + */
> +STATIC union xfs_btree_key *
> +xfs_btree_high_key_addr(
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + int n,
> + struct xfs_btree_block *block)
> +{
> + return (union xfs_btree_key *)
> + ((char *)block + xfs_btree_high_key_offset(cur, n));
> +}
> +
> +/*
> * Return a pointer to the n-th block pointer in the btree block.
> */
> STATIC union xfs_btree_ptr *
> @@ -1217,7 +1282,7 @@ xfs_btree_copy_keys(
> int numkeys)
> {
> ASSERT(numkeys >= 0);
> - memcpy(dst_key, src_key, numkeys * cur->bc_ops->key_len);
> + memcpy(dst_key, src_key, numkeys * xfs_btree_key_len(cur));
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1263,8 +1328,8 @@ xfs_btree_shift_keys(
> ASSERT(numkeys >= 0);
> ASSERT(dir == 1 || dir == -1);
>
> - dst_key = (char *)key + (dir * cur->bc_ops->key_len);
> - memmove(dst_key, key, numkeys * cur->bc_ops->key_len);
> + dst_key = (char *)key + (dir * xfs_btree_key_len(cur));
> + memmove(dst_key, key, numkeys * xfs_btree_key_len(cur));
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1879,6 +1944,180 @@ error0:
> return error;
> }
>
> +/* Determine the low and high keys of a leaf block */
> +STATIC void
> +xfs_btree_find_leaf_keys(
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + struct xfs_btree_block *block,
> + union xfs_btree_key *low,
> + union xfs_btree_key *high)
> +{
> + int n;
> + union xfs_btree_rec *rec;
> + union xfs_btree_key max_hkey;
> + union xfs_btree_key hkey;
> +
> + rec = xfs_btree_rec_addr(cur, 1, block);
> + cur->bc_ops->init_key_from_rec(low, rec);
> +
> + if (!(cur->bc_ops->flags & XFS_BTREE_OPS_OVERLAPPING))
> + return;
> +
> + cur->bc_ops->init_high_key_from_rec(&max_hkey, rec);
> + for (n = 2; n <= xfs_btree_get_numrecs(block); n++) {
> + rec = xfs_btree_rec_addr(cur, n, block);
> + cur->bc_ops->init_high_key_from_rec(&hkey, rec);
> + if (cur->bc_ops->diff_two_keys(cur, &max_hkey, &hkey) > 0)
> + max_hkey = hkey;
> + }
> +
> + *high = max_hkey;
> +}
> +
> +/* Determine the low and high keys of a node block */
> +STATIC void
> +xfs_btree_find_node_keys(
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + struct xfs_btree_block *block,
> + union xfs_btree_key *low,
> + union xfs_btree_key *high)
> +{
> + int n;
> + union xfs_btree_key *hkey;
> + union xfs_btree_key *max_hkey;
> +
> + *low = *xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, 1, block);
> +
> + if (!(cur->bc_ops->flags & XFS_BTREE_OPS_OVERLAPPING))
> + return;
> +
> + max_hkey = xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, 1, block);
> + for (n = 2; n <= xfs_btree_get_numrecs(block); n++) {
> + hkey = xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, n, block);
> + if (cur->bc_ops->diff_two_keys(cur, max_hkey, hkey) > 0)
> + max_hkey = hkey;
> + }
> +
> + *high = *max_hkey;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Update parental low & high keys from some block all the way back to the
> + * root of the btree.
> + */
> +STATIC int
> +__xfs_btree_updkeys(
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + int level,
> + struct xfs_btree_block *block,
> + struct xfs_buf *bp0,
> + bool force_all)
> +{
> + union xfs_btree_key lkey; /* keys from current level */
> + union xfs_btree_key hkey;
> + union xfs_btree_key *nlkey; /* keys from the next level up */
> + union xfs_btree_key *nhkey;
> + struct xfs_buf *bp;
> + int ptr = -1;
ptr doesn't appear to require initialization.
> +
> + if (!(cur->bc_ops->flags & XFS_BTREE_OPS_OVERLAPPING))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (level + 1 >= cur->bc_nlevels)
> + return 0;
This could use a comment to indicate we're checking for a parent level
to update.
> +
> + trace_xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, level, bp0);
> +
> + if (level == 0)
> + xfs_btree_find_leaf_keys(cur, block, &lkey, &hkey);
> + else
> + xfs_btree_find_node_keys(cur, block, &lkey, &hkey);
> + for (level++; level < cur->bc_nlevels; level++) {
> + block = xfs_btree_get_block(cur, level, &bp);
> + trace_xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, level, bp);
> + ptr = cur->bc_ptrs[level];
> + nlkey = xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, ptr, block);
> + nhkey = xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, ptr, block);
> + if (!(cur->bc_ops->diff_two_keys(cur, nlkey, &lkey) != 0 ||
> + cur->bc_ops->diff_two_keys(cur, nhkey, &hkey) != 0) &&
> + !force_all)
> + break;
> + memcpy(nlkey, &lkey, cur->bc_ops->key_len);
> + memcpy(nhkey, &hkey, cur->bc_ops->key_len);
> + xfs_btree_log_keys(cur, bp, ptr, ptr);
> + if (level + 1 >= cur->bc_nlevels)
> + break;
> + xfs_btree_find_node_keys(cur, block, &lkey, &hkey);
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Update all the keys from a sibling block at some level in the cursor back
> + * to the root, stopping when we find a key pair that doesn't need updating.
> + */
> +STATIC int
> +xfs_btree_sibling_updkeys(
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + int level,
> + int ptr,
> + struct xfs_btree_block *block,
> + struct xfs_buf *bp0)
> +{
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *ncur;
> + int stat;
> + int error;
> +
> + error = xfs_btree_dup_cursor(cur, &ncur);
> + if (error)
> + return error;
> +
> + if (level + 1 >= ncur->bc_nlevels)
> + error = -EDOM;
> + else if (ptr == XFS_BB_RIGHTSIB)
> + error = xfs_btree_increment(ncur, level + 1, &stat);
> + else if (ptr == XFS_BB_LEFTSIB)
> + error = xfs_btree_decrement(ncur, level + 1, &stat);
> + else
> + error = -EBADE;
So we inc/dec the cursor at the next level up the tree, then update the
keys up that path with the __xfs_btree_updkeys() call below. The inc/dec
calls explicitly say that they don't alter the cursor below the level,
so it looks like we'd end up with a weird cursor path here.
Digging around further, it looks like we pass the sibling bp/block
pointers from the caller and thus __xfs_btree_updkeys() should do the
correct thing, but this is not very clear. If I'm on the right track,
I'd suggest to add a big fat comment here. :)
> + if (error || !stat)
> + return error;
Looks like a potential cursor leak on error.
> +
> + error = __xfs_btree_updkeys(ncur, level, block, bp0, false);
> + xfs_btree_del_cursor(ncur, XFS_BTREE_NOERROR);
> + return error;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Update all the keys from some level in cursor back to the root, stopping
> + * when we find a key pair that don't need updating.
> + */
> +STATIC int
> +xfs_btree_updkeys(
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + int level)
> +{
> + struct xfs_buf *bp;
> + struct xfs_btree_block *block;
> +
> + block = xfs_btree_get_block(cur, level, &bp);
> + return __xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, level, block, bp, false);
> +}
> +
> +/* Update all the keys from some level in cursor back to the root. */
> +STATIC int
> +xfs_btree_updkeys_force(
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + int level)
> +{
> + struct xfs_buf *bp;
> + struct xfs_btree_block *block;
> +
> + block = xfs_btree_get_block(cur, level, &bp);
> + return __xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, level, block, bp, true);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Update keys at all levels from here to the root along the cursor's path.
> */
> @@ -1893,6 +2132,9 @@ xfs_btree_updkey(
> union xfs_btree_key *kp;
> int ptr;
>
> + if (cur->bc_ops->flags & XFS_BTREE_OPS_OVERLAPPING)
> + return 0;
> +
> XFS_BTREE_TRACE_CURSOR(cur, XBT_ENTRY);
> XFS_BTREE_TRACE_ARGIK(cur, level, keyp);
>
> @@ -1970,7 +2212,8 @@ xfs_btree_update(
> ptr, LASTREC_UPDATE);
> }
>
> - /* Updating first rec in leaf. Pass new key value up to our parent. */
> + /* Pass new key value up to our parent. */
> + xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, 0);
> if (ptr == 1) {
> union xfs_btree_key key;
>
> @@ -2149,7 +2392,9 @@ xfs_btree_lshift(
> rkp = &key;
> }
>
> - /* Update the parent key values of right. */
> + /* Update the parent key values of left and right. */
> + xfs_btree_sibling_updkeys(cur, level, XFS_BB_LEFTSIB, left, lbp);
> + xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, level);
> error = xfs_btree_updkey(cur, rkp, level + 1);
> if (error)
> goto error0;
> @@ -2321,6 +2566,9 @@ xfs_btree_rshift(
> if (error)
> goto error1;
>
> + /* Update left and right parent pointers */
> + xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, level);
> + xfs_btree_updkeys(tcur, level);
In this case, we grab the last record of the block, increment from there
and update using the cursor. This is much more straightforward, imo.
Could we use this approach in the left shift case as well?
> error = xfs_btree_updkey(tcur, rkp, level + 1);
> if (error)
> goto error1;
> @@ -2356,7 +2604,7 @@ __xfs_btree_split(
> struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> int level,
> union xfs_btree_ptr *ptrp,
> - union xfs_btree_key *key,
> + struct xfs_btree_double_key *key,
> struct xfs_btree_cur **curp,
> int *stat) /* success/failure */
> {
> @@ -2452,9 +2700,6 @@ __xfs_btree_split(
>
> xfs_btree_log_keys(cur, rbp, 1, rrecs);
> xfs_btree_log_ptrs(cur, rbp, 1, rrecs);
> -
> - /* Grab the keys to the entries moved to the right block */
> - xfs_btree_copy_keys(cur, key, rkp, 1);
> } else {
> /* It's a leaf. Move records. */
> union xfs_btree_rec *lrp; /* left record pointer */
> @@ -2465,12 +2710,8 @@ __xfs_btree_split(
>
> xfs_btree_copy_recs(cur, rrp, lrp, rrecs);
> xfs_btree_log_recs(cur, rbp, 1, rrecs);
> -
> - cur->bc_ops->init_key_from_rec(key,
> - xfs_btree_rec_addr(cur, 1, right));
> }
>
> -
> /*
> * Find the left block number by looking in the buffer.
> * Adjust numrecs, sibling pointers.
> @@ -2484,6 +2725,12 @@ __xfs_btree_split(
> xfs_btree_set_numrecs(left, lrecs);
> xfs_btree_set_numrecs(right, xfs_btree_get_numrecs(right) + rrecs);
>
> + /* Find the low & high keys for the new block. */
> + if (level > 0)
> + xfs_btree_find_node_keys(cur, right, &key->low, &key->high);
> + else
> + xfs_btree_find_leaf_keys(cur, right, &key->low, &key->high);
> +
Why not push these into the above if/else where the previous key
copy/init calls were removed from?
> xfs_btree_log_block(cur, rbp, XFS_BB_ALL_BITS);
> xfs_btree_log_block(cur, lbp, XFS_BB_NUMRECS | XFS_BB_RIGHTSIB);
>
> @@ -2499,6 +2746,10 @@ __xfs_btree_split(
> xfs_btree_set_sibling(cur, rrblock, &rptr, XFS_BB_LEFTSIB);
> xfs_btree_log_block(cur, rrbp, XFS_BB_LEFTSIB);
> }
> +
> + /* Update the left block's keys... */
> + xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, level);
> +
> /*
> * If the cursor is really in the right block, move it there.
> * If it's just pointing past the last entry in left, then we'll
> @@ -2537,7 +2788,7 @@ struct xfs_btree_split_args {
> struct xfs_btree_cur *cur;
> int level;
> union xfs_btree_ptr *ptrp;
> - union xfs_btree_key *key;
> + struct xfs_btree_double_key *key;
> struct xfs_btree_cur **curp;
> int *stat; /* success/failure */
> int result;
> @@ -2586,7 +2837,7 @@ xfs_btree_split(
> struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> int level,
> union xfs_btree_ptr *ptrp,
> - union xfs_btree_key *key,
> + struct xfs_btree_double_key *key,
> struct xfs_btree_cur **curp,
> int *stat) /* success/failure */
> {
> @@ -2806,27 +3057,27 @@ xfs_btree_new_root(
> bp = lbp;
> nptr = 2;
> }
> +
> /* Fill in the new block's btree header and log it. */
> xfs_btree_init_block_cur(cur, nbp, cur->bc_nlevels, 2);
> xfs_btree_log_block(cur, nbp, XFS_BB_ALL_BITS);
> ASSERT(!xfs_btree_ptr_is_null(cur, &lptr) &&
> !xfs_btree_ptr_is_null(cur, &rptr));
> -
?
> /* Fill in the key data in the new root. */
> if (xfs_btree_get_level(left) > 0) {
> - xfs_btree_copy_keys(cur,
> + xfs_btree_find_node_keys(cur, left,
> xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, 1, new),
> - xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, 1, left), 1);
> - xfs_btree_copy_keys(cur,
> + xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, 1, new));
> + xfs_btree_find_node_keys(cur, right,
> xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, 2, new),
> - xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, 1, right), 1);
> + xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, 2, new));
> } else {
> - cur->bc_ops->init_key_from_rec(
> - xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, 1, new),
> - xfs_btree_rec_addr(cur, 1, left));
> - cur->bc_ops->init_key_from_rec(
> - xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, 2, new),
> - xfs_btree_rec_addr(cur, 1, right));
> + xfs_btree_find_leaf_keys(cur, left,
> + xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, 1, new),
> + xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, 1, new));
> + xfs_btree_find_leaf_keys(cur, right,
> + xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, 2, new),
> + xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, 2, new));
> }
> xfs_btree_log_keys(cur, nbp, 1, 2);
>
> @@ -2837,6 +3088,7 @@ xfs_btree_new_root(
> xfs_btree_ptr_addr(cur, 2, new), &rptr, 1);
> xfs_btree_log_ptrs(cur, nbp, 1, 2);
>
> +
Extra line.
> /* Fix up the cursor. */
> xfs_btree_setbuf(cur, cur->bc_nlevels, nbp);
> cur->bc_ptrs[cur->bc_nlevels] = nptr;
> @@ -2862,7 +3114,7 @@ xfs_btree_make_block_unfull(
> int *index, /* new tree index */
> union xfs_btree_ptr *nptr, /* new btree ptr */
> struct xfs_btree_cur **ncur, /* new btree cursor */
> - union xfs_btree_key *key, /* key of new block */
> + struct xfs_btree_double_key *key, /* key of new block */
> int *stat)
> {
> int error = 0;
> @@ -2918,6 +3170,22 @@ xfs_btree_make_block_unfull(
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/* Copy a double key into a btree block. */
> +static void
> +xfs_btree_copy_double_keys(
> + struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + int ptr,
> + struct xfs_btree_block *block,
> + struct xfs_btree_double_key *key)
> +{
> + memcpy(xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, ptr, block), &key->low,
> + cur->bc_ops->key_len);
> +
> + if (cur->bc_ops->flags & XFS_BTREE_OPS_OVERLAPPING)
> + memcpy(xfs_btree_high_key_addr(cur, ptr, block), &key->high,
> + cur->bc_ops->key_len);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Insert one record/level. Return information to the caller
> * allowing the next level up to proceed if necessary.
> @@ -2927,7 +3195,7 @@ xfs_btree_insrec(
> struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, /* btree cursor */
> int level, /* level to insert record at */
> union xfs_btree_ptr *ptrp, /* i/o: block number inserted */
> - union xfs_btree_key *key, /* i/o: block key for ptrp */
> + struct xfs_btree_double_key *key, /* i/o: block key for ptrp */
> struct xfs_btree_cur **curp, /* output: new cursor replacing cur */
> int *stat) /* success/failure */
> {
> @@ -2935,7 +3203,7 @@ xfs_btree_insrec(
> struct xfs_buf *bp; /* buffer for block */
> union xfs_btree_ptr nptr; /* new block ptr */
> struct xfs_btree_cur *ncur; /* new btree cursor */
> - union xfs_btree_key nkey; /* new block key */
> + struct xfs_btree_double_key nkey; /* new block key */
> union xfs_btree_rec rec; /* record to insert */
> int optr; /* old key/record index */
> int ptr; /* key/record index */
> @@ -2944,11 +3212,12 @@ xfs_btree_insrec(
> #ifdef DEBUG
> int i;
> #endif
> + xfs_daddr_t old_bn;
>
> /* Make a key out of the record data to be inserted, and save it. */
> if (level == 0) {
> cur->bc_ops->init_rec_from_cur(cur, &rec);
> - cur->bc_ops->init_key_from_rec(key, &rec);
> + cur->bc_ops->init_key_from_rec(&key->low, &rec);
> }
>
> XFS_BTREE_TRACE_CURSOR(cur, XBT_ENTRY);
> @@ -2983,6 +3252,7 @@ xfs_btree_insrec(
>
> /* Get pointers to the btree buffer and block. */
> block = xfs_btree_get_block(cur, level, &bp);
> + old_bn = bp ? bp->b_bn : XFS_BUF_DADDR_NULL;
> numrecs = xfs_btree_get_numrecs(block);
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
> @@ -2996,7 +3266,7 @@ xfs_btree_insrec(
> ASSERT(cur->bc_ops->recs_inorder(cur, &rec,
> xfs_btree_rec_addr(cur, ptr, block)));
> } else {
> - ASSERT(cur->bc_ops->keys_inorder(cur, key,
> + ASSERT(cur->bc_ops->keys_inorder(cur, &key->low,
> xfs_btree_key_addr(cur, ptr, block)));
> }
> }
> @@ -3059,7 +3329,7 @@ xfs_btree_insrec(
> #endif
>
> /* Now put the new data in, bump numrecs and log it. */
> - xfs_btree_copy_keys(cur, kp, key, 1);
> + xfs_btree_copy_double_keys(cur, ptr, block, key);
> xfs_btree_copy_ptrs(cur, pp, ptrp, 1);
> numrecs++;
> xfs_btree_set_numrecs(block, numrecs);
> @@ -3095,8 +3365,24 @@ xfs_btree_insrec(
> xfs_btree_log_block(cur, bp, XFS_BB_NUMRECS);
>
> /* If we inserted at the start of a block, update the parents' keys. */
This comment is associated with the codeblock that has been pushed
further down, no?
> + if (ncur && bp->b_bn != old_bn) {
> + /*
> + * We just inserted into a new tree block, which means that
> + * the key for the block is in nkey, not the tree.
> + */
> + if (level == 0)
> + xfs_btree_find_leaf_keys(cur, block, &nkey.low,
> + &nkey.high);
> + else
> + xfs_btree_find_node_keys(cur, block, &nkey.low,
> + &nkey.high);
> + } else {
> + /* Updating the left block, do it the standard way. */
> + xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, level);
> + }
> +
Not quite sure I follow the purpose of this hunk. Is this for the case
where a btree split occurs, nkey is filled in for the new/right block
and then (after nkey is filled in) the new record ends up being added to
the new block? If so, what about the case where ncur is not created?
(It looks like that's possible from the code, but I could easily be
missing some context as to why that's not the case.)
In any event, I think we could elaborate a bit in the comment on why
this is necessary. I'd also move it above the top-level if/else.
> if (optr == 1) {
> - error = xfs_btree_updkey(cur, key, level + 1);
> + error = xfs_btree_updkey(cur, &key->low, level + 1);
> if (error)
> goto error0;
> }
> @@ -3147,7 +3433,7 @@ xfs_btree_insert(
> union xfs_btree_ptr nptr; /* new block number (split result) */
> struct xfs_btree_cur *ncur; /* new cursor (split result) */
> struct xfs_btree_cur *pcur; /* previous level's cursor */
> - union xfs_btree_key key; /* key of block to insert */
> + struct xfs_btree_double_key key; /* key of block to insert */
Probably should fix up the function param alignment here and the couple
other or so places we make this change.
Brian
>
> level = 0;
> ncur = NULL;
> @@ -3552,6 +3838,7 @@ xfs_btree_delrec(
> * If we deleted the leftmost entry in the block, update the
> * key values above us in the tree.
> */
> + xfs_btree_updkeys(cur, level);
> if (ptr == 1) {
> error = xfs_btree_updkey(cur, keyp, level + 1);
> if (error)
> @@ -3882,6 +4169,16 @@ xfs_btree_delrec(
> if (level > 0)
> cur->bc_ptrs[level]--;
>
> + /*
> + * We combined blocks, so we have to update the parent keys if the
> + * btree supports overlapped intervals. However, bc_ptrs[level + 1]
> + * points to the old block so that the caller knows which record to
> + * delete. Therefore, the caller must be savvy enough to call updkeys
> + * for us if we return stat == 2. The other exit points from this
> + * function don't require deletions further up the tree, so they can
> + * call updkeys directly.
> + */
> +
> XFS_BTREE_TRACE_CURSOR(cur, XBT_EXIT);
> /* Return value means the next level up has something to do. */
> *stat = 2;
> @@ -3907,6 +4204,7 @@ xfs_btree_delete(
> int error; /* error return value */
> int level;
> int i;
> + bool joined = false;
>
> XFS_BTREE_TRACE_CURSOR(cur, XBT_ENTRY);
>
> @@ -3920,8 +4218,17 @@ xfs_btree_delete(
> error = xfs_btree_delrec(cur, level, &i);
> if (error)
> goto error0;
> + if (i == 2)
> + joined = true;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * If we combined blocks as part of deleting the record, delrec won't
> + * have updated the parent keys so we have to do that here.
> + */
> + if (joined)
> + xfs_btree_updkeys_force(cur, 0);
> +
> if (i == 0) {
> for (level = 1; level < cur->bc_nlevels; level++) {
> if (cur->bc_ptrs[level] == 0) {
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h
> index b99c018..a5ec6c7 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_btree.h
> @@ -126,6 +126,9 @@ struct xfs_btree_ops {
> size_t key_len;
> size_t rec_len;
>
> + /* flags */
> + uint flags;
> +
> /* cursor operations */
> struct xfs_btree_cur *(*dup_cursor)(struct xfs_btree_cur *);
> void (*update_cursor)(struct xfs_btree_cur *src,
> @@ -162,11 +165,21 @@ struct xfs_btree_ops {
> union xfs_btree_rec *rec);
> void (*init_ptr_from_cur)(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> union xfs_btree_ptr *ptr);
> + void (*init_high_key_from_rec)(union xfs_btree_key *key,
> + union xfs_btree_rec *rec);
>
> /* difference between key value and cursor value */
> __int64_t (*key_diff)(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> union xfs_btree_key *key);
>
> + /*
> + * Difference between key2 and key1 -- positive if key2 > key1,
> + * negative if key2 < key1, and zero if equal.
> + */
> + __int64_t (*diff_two_keys)(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur,
> + union xfs_btree_key *key1,
> + union xfs_btree_key *key2);
> +
> const struct xfs_buf_ops *buf_ops;
>
> #if defined(DEBUG) || defined(XFS_WARN)
> @@ -182,6 +195,9 @@ struct xfs_btree_ops {
> #endif
> };
>
> +/* btree ops flags */
> +#define XFS_BTREE_OPS_OVERLAPPING (1<<0) /* overlapping intervals */
> +
> /*
> * Reasons for the update_lastrec method to be called.
> */
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> index 68f27f7..ffea28c 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct xlog_recover_item;
> struct xfs_buf_log_format;
> struct xfs_inode_log_format;
> struct xfs_bmbt_irec;
> +struct xfs_btree_cur;
>
> DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_attr_list_class,
> TP_PROTO(struct xfs_attr_list_context *ctx),
> @@ -2183,6 +2184,41 @@ DEFINE_DISCARD_EVENT(xfs_discard_toosmall);
> DEFINE_DISCARD_EVENT(xfs_discard_exclude);
> DEFINE_DISCARD_EVENT(xfs_discard_busy);
>
> +/* btree cursor events */
> +DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(xfs_btree_cur_class,
> + TP_PROTO(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, int level, struct xfs_buf *bp),
> + TP_ARGS(cur, level, bp),
> + TP_STRUCT__entry(
> + __field(dev_t, dev)
> + __field(xfs_btnum_t, btnum)
> + __field(int, level)
> + __field(int, nlevels)
> + __field(int, ptr)
> + __field(xfs_daddr_t, daddr)
> + ),
> + TP_fast_assign(
> + __entry->dev = cur->bc_mp->m_super->s_dev;
> + __entry->btnum = cur->bc_btnum;
> + __entry->level = level;
> + __entry->nlevels = cur->bc_nlevels;
> + __entry->ptr = cur->bc_ptrs[level];
> + __entry->daddr = bp->b_bn;
> + ),
> + TP_printk("dev %d:%d btnum %d level %d/%d ptr %d daddr 0x%llx",
> + MAJOR(__entry->dev), MINOR(__entry->dev),
> + __entry->btnum,
> + __entry->level,
> + __entry->nlevels,
> + __entry->ptr,
> + (unsigned long long)__entry->daddr)
> +)
> +
> +#define DEFINE_BTREE_CUR_EVENT(name) \
> +DEFINE_EVENT(xfs_btree_cur_class, name, \
> + TP_PROTO(struct xfs_btree_cur *cur, int level, struct xfs_buf *bp), \
> + TP_ARGS(cur, level, bp))
> +DEFINE_BTREE_CUR_EVENT(xfs_btree_updkeys);
> +
> #endif /* _TRACE_XFS_H */
>
> #undef TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
