Re: [PATCH] aio: Cleanup unnecessary test for nr_pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/20/16 at 03:17P, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:05:45PM +0800, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > Ping. Any comment is appreciate.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Minfei
> > 
> > On 06/13/16 at 12:33P, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > > The variable nr_pages is always more than 1, because the size of
> > > structure aio_ring is bigger than 0. So remove unnecessary test for
> > > nr_page.
> 
> What this test really checks is that the value we'd put into nr_pages
> (PFN_UP(size)) is not greater than 2^31.  Whether it's redundant or not
> is a separate question - it very well might be, due to the code in
> ioctx_alloc() that caps nr_events, but that needs a proof.  In any case,
> the reasons you are offering in commit message are wrong - it's about
> size being too _large_, not too small.

Hmm. But there is a following test in function ioctx_alloc which is used
to limit the max of nr_events.

 713         /* Prevent overflows */
 714         if (nr_events > (0x10000000U / sizeof(struct io_event))) {
 715                 pr_debug("ENOMEM: nr_events too high\n");
 716                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 717         }

So according to this test, we can make sure that nr_pages(PFN_UP(size))
cann't be greater than 2^31, and max to 2^28.

Thanks
Minfei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux