Re: [PATCH 15/21] time: Add time64_to_tm()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:18 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> time_to_tm() takes time_t as an argument.
>>> time_t is not y2038 safe.
>>> Add time64_to_tm() that takes time64_t as an argument
>>> which is y2038 safe.
>>> The plan is to eventually replace all calls to time_to_tm()
>>> by time64_to_tm().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This looks sane to me. Are you hoping for me to queue this, or would
>> you like i to go though the fsdev maintainers with my ack?
>>
>> In either case.
>>
>> Acked-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This is only used by the scsi fnic driver.
> I will separate these 2 patches from this CURRENT_TIME series and
> then both the patches can be merged through the respective trees.

Sorry, this was not quite clear. I've gone ahead and queued this one
patch for testing, but let me know and I'll drop it if its going
through a different tree.

thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux