On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 04:41:17AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:18:05PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > Introduce XFLAGs for the new XFS reflink inode flag and the CoW extent > > size hint, and actually plumb the CoW extent size hint into the fsxattr > > structure. > > > > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Should go behind all the updates that are useful without any new > rmap or reflink functionality. In fact it would be great if you > could send out a series with just those little fixes and cleanups > first. > I'd take that a step further and suggest the entire series be split into independent feature series, as appropriate. Unless I'm missing something, I don't think there's any reason these all need to be bundled together. Further, my expectation is that they probably end up being merged as independent units, so I think it's easier for everybody for Darrick to carve that up on the logical boundaries rather than assume all reviewers and maintainer are going to do so consistently. Note that I'm not saying this has to be reposted.. I think I can pull off the rmap bits for the time being. I'm just suggesting that if a repost is required from this point forward for any of the logical subunits (deps, rmap, reflink, scrub), I'd suggest to post, version and changelog those units independently. Brian > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
