Hi Miklos,
Did you get any time to look into the patch?
Its been more than two months.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Ashish Sangwan
<ashishsangwan2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> *ping*
>
> Last time it bounced off the fuse mailing list.
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> While sending the blocking directIO in fuse, the write request is broken
>> into sub-requests, each of default size 128k and all the requests are sent
>> in non-blocking background mode if async_dio mode is supported by libfuse.
>> The process which issue the write wait for the completion of all the
>> sub-requests. Sending multiple requests parallely gives a chance to perform
>> parallel writes in the user space fuse implementation if it is
>> multi-threaded and hence improves the performance.
>>
>> When there is a size extending aio dio write, we switch to
>> blocking mode so that we can properly update the size of the file after
>> completion of the writes. However, in this situation all the sub-requests
>> are sent in serialized manner where the next request is sent only after
>> receiving the reply of the current request. Hence the multi-threaded user
>> space implementation is not utilized properly.
>>
>> This patch changes the size extending aio dio behavior to exactly follow
>> blocking dio. For multi threaded fuse implementation having 10 threads and
>> using buffer size of 64MB to perform async directIO, we are getting double
>> the speed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashish Sangwan <ashishsangwan2@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> fs/fuse/file.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>> fs/fuse/fuse_i.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
>> index 9dde38f..b4f8b83 100644
>> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
>> @@ -572,11 +572,11 @@ static void fuse_aio_complete(struct fuse_io_priv *io, int err, ssize_t pos)
>> io->bytes = pos;
>>
>> left = --io->reqs;
>> - if (!left && is_sync)
>> + if (!left && (is_sync || io->blocking_aio))
>> complete(io->done);
>> spin_unlock(&io->lock);
>>
>> - if (!left && !is_sync) {
>> + if (!left && !is_sync && !io->blocking_aio) {
>> ssize_t res = fuse_get_res_by_io(io);
>>
>> if (res >= 0) {
>> @@ -2884,17 +2884,17 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t offset)
>> */
>> io->async = async_dio;
>> io->iocb = iocb;
>> + io->blocking_aio = false;
>>
>> /*
>> - * We cannot asynchronously extend the size of a file. We have no method
>> - * to wait on real async I/O requests, so we must submit this request
>> - * synchronously.
>> + * We cannot asynchronously extend the size of a file.
>> + * In such case the aio will behave exactly like sync io.
>> */
>> if (!is_sync && (offset + count > i_size) &&
>> iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
>> - io->async = false;
>> + io->blocking_aio = true;
>>
>> - if (io->async && is_sync) {
>> + if (io->async && (is_sync | io->blocking_aio)) {
>> /*
>> * Additional reference to keep io around after
>> * calling fuse_aio_complete()
>> @@ -2914,7 +2914,7 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t offset)
>> fuse_aio_complete(io, ret < 0 ? ret : 0, -1);
>>
>> /* we have a non-extending, async request, so return */
>> - if (!is_sync)
>> + if (!is_sync && !io->blocking_aio)
>> return -EIOCBQUEUED;
>>
>> wait_for_completion(&wait);
>> diff --git a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
>> index eddbe02..a7cf03f 100644
>> --- a/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
>> +++ b/fs/fuse/fuse_i.h
>> @@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ struct fuse_io_priv {
>> struct kiocb *iocb;
>> struct file *file;
>> struct completion *done;
>> + bool blocking_aio;
>> };
>>
>> #define FUSE_IO_PRIV_SYNC(f) \
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
