On 5/30/16, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I contacted the LTP mailing-list on the acl_test01 issues - WIP. >> >> From the LTP-ML I got the impulse to test with the xattr testcase... >> >> root# cd /opt/ltp ; LC_ALL=C ./runltp -s xattr | tee xattr.log >> >> ...this fails only in the cgroup_xattr testcase. >> [...] > > The test seems to try getting/setting an xattr named "trusted." (no > suffix). That's an invalid name; such invalid names are rejected since > commit 98e9cb571 "vfs: Distinguish between full xattr names and proper > prefixes" (v4.5-rc1). > > Could you try removing that from the LTP test and rerun it? > AFAICS I need to re-compile... [ testcases/kernel/controllers/cgroup_xattr/cgroup_xattr.c ] ... /* only security.* & trusted.* are valid key names */ static struct tst_key tkeys[] = { { .name = "security.", .good = 1, }, { .name = "trusted.test", .good = 1, }, { .name = "trusted.", .good = 1, }, <--- XXX: This one only? { .name = "user.", .good = 0, }, { .name = "system.", .good = 0, }, }; ... Which "trusted." line or lines shall I remove? - Sedat - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html