On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 06:12:33PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 27-05-16 07:53:04, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:19:56PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > To avoid clearing of capabilities or security related extended
> > > attributes too early, inode_change_ok() will need to take dentry instead
> > > of inode. Propagate dentry down to functions calling inode_change_ok().
> > > This is rather straightforward except for xfs_set_mode() function which
> > > does not have dentry easily available. Luckily that function does not
> > > call inode_change_ok() anyway so we just have to do a little dance with
> > > function prototypes.
> >
> > The idea behind the change is good, but I think the little dance
> > could be improved as it makes the layering of the code seem weirdly
> > unbalanced to me. e.g.
> >
> > xfs_vn_setattr()
> > xfs_vn_setattr_size() <<<< inode_change_ok() here
> >
> > xfs_vn_setattr()
> > xfs_vn_setattr_nonsize() <<<< inode_change_ok() here
> > xfs_setattr_nonsize()
> >
> > xfs_vn_setattr()
> > xfs_vn_setattr_size()
> > xfs_vn_setattr_nonsize() <<<< inode_change_ok() here
> > xfs_setattr_nonsize()
> >
> > And to be more confusing, the externally callable functions for the
> > rest of the XFS code are now xfs_vn_setattr_size() and
> > xfs_setattr_nonsize() which now have different calling context
> > limitations.
> >
> > I think adding a little symmetric make sense. i.e:
> >
> > xfs_vn_change_ok(dentry, iattr)
> > {
> > + if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY)
> > + return -EROFS;
> > +
> > + if (XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(mp))
> > + return -EIO;
> > +
> > + error = inode_change_ok(inode, iattr);
> > + if (error)
> > + return error;
> > +
> > }
> >
> > xfs_vn_setattr_size(d, i)
> > {
> > xfs_vn_change_ok(d, i)
> > xfs_setattr_size(ip, i)
> > }
> >
> > xfs_vn_setattr_nonsize(d, i)
> > {
> > xfs_vn_change_ok(d, i)
> > xfs_setattr_nonsize(ip, i)
> > }
> >
> > xfs_vn_setattr(d, i)
> > {
> > xfs_vn_change_ok(d, i)
> > <rest of xfs_vn_setattr unchanged>
> > }
> >
> > And remove the inode_change_ok() code from xfs_setattr_size and
> > xfs_setattr_nonsize() completely. You've already done this with
> > xfs_vn_setattr_nonsize() - it just needs to be made symmetric to
> > keep a clean layering between VFS interfaces and internal XFS
> > interfaces...
>
> Ok, something like attached patch?
Yup, looks much better to me!
Acked-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
