Re: pwrite04 ltp bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:51:30PM -0400, Mike Marshall wrote:
> Hi everyone...
> 
> While fixing a couple of LTP regressions in the out-of-tree Orangefs
> kernel module, I think I found a problem with the pwrite04 test,
> here's what I think was meant:
> 
> # git diff testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> diff --git a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> index b297682..4ca7dc1 100644
> --- a/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> +++ b/testcases/kernel/syscalls/pwrite/pwrite04.c
> @@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ int main(int ac, char *av[])
> 
>                 }
>                 if (statbuf.st_size != K5) {
> -                       tst_resm(TFAIL, "file size is %ld != K4",
> +                       tst_resm(TFAIL, "file size is %ld != K5",
>                                  statbuf.st_size);
> -
> +                       cleanup();
>                 }
>                 tst_resm(TPASS, "O_APPEND test passed.");
> 
> Should I even be talking about this here, or should I go find
> the github maintainers of LTP and ask them about it?

Can you please send a patch to ltp list (ltp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)? That's
where ltp developments and discussions happen.

Thanks,
Eryu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux