On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 12:25 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Vishal,
>
> can you also pick up the my patch to add a low-level __dax_zero_range
> that I cced you on? That way we can avoid a nasty merge conflict with
> my xfs/iomap changes.
Good idea - I'll do that for the next posting. I'll wait a day or two
for any additional reviews/acks.
I'm looking to get all this into a branch in the nvdimm tree once Jan
splits up his dax-locking series..
Mostly I guess I'm looking for a yay or nay for the block layer changes
(patch 2). Jens?��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
