On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > timespec64_add_safe() has been defined in time64.h for > 64 bit systems. > But, 32 bit systems only have an extern function prototype defined. > Provide a definition for the above function. > > The function will be necessary as part of y2038 changes. > struct timespec is not y2038 safe. All references to timespec will > be replaced by struct timespec64. The function is meant to be a > replacement for timespec_add_safe(). > > The implementation is similar to timespec_add_safe(). > > Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/time64.h | 4 +--- > kernel/time/time.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Looks ok at the first glance. I've queued these up for testing, however I only got #1 and #3 of the set. Are you hoping these two patches will go through tip/timers/core or are you looking for acks so they can go via another tree? thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
