On 04/29/2016 11:39 PM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> When a partition is not aligned by 4KB, mount -o dax succeeds,
> but any read/write access to the filesystem fails, except for
> metadata update.
>
> Add alignment check to ext4_fill_super() when -o dax is specified.
>
> Reported-by: Micah Parrish <micah.parrish@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 304c712..90a8670 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -3421,6 +3421,12 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
> "error: unsupported blocksize for dax");
> goto failed_mount;
> }
> + if (sb->s_bdev->bd_part->start_sect % (PAGE_SIZE / 512) ||
> + sb->s_bdev->bd_part->nr_sects % (PAGE_SIZE / 512)) {
Can you please not do this like this? For me is a layering violation only
the device should know what are its limits.
I would prefer if you just try to bdev_direct_access() the 0 sector and if
it fails then fail here. This way you let the device decide what it needs
and if/how to support unaligned partitions.
(For example it could by shrinking its size)
Thanks
Boaz
> + ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
> + "error: unaligned partition for dax");
> + goto failed_mount;
> + }
> if (!sb->s_bdev->bd_disk->fops->direct_access) {
> ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
> "error: device does not support dax");
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvdimm mailing list
> Linux-nvdimm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
