Re: parallel lookups on NFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2016-04-30 at 15:22 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 09:22:56AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > 
> > ...but looks like same problem:
> > 
> > (gdb) list *(__kmalloc_track_caller+0x96)
> > 0xffffffff811f9a06 is in __kmalloc_track_caller (mm/slub.c:245).
> > 240      *                      Core slab cache functions
> > 241      *******************************************************************/
> > 242
> > 243     static inline void *get_freepointer(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> > 244     {
> > 245             return *(void **)(object + s->offset);
> > 246     }
> > 247
> > 248     static void prefetch_freepointer(const struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
> > 249     {
> Joy...  Does that happen without the last commit as well?  I realize that
> memory corruption could well have been introduced earlier and changes in
> the last commit had only increased the odds, but...


Not exactly, but the test seems to have deadlocked without the last
patch in play. Here's the ls command:

[jlayton@rawhide ~]$ cat /proc/1425/stack
[<ffffffffa03d6eec>] nfs_block_sillyrename+0x5c/0xa0 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa03c8ef8>] nfs_readdir+0xf8/0x620 [nfs]
[<ffffffff812232bb>] iterate_dir+0x16b/0x1a0
[<ffffffff812236e8>] SyS_getdents+0x88/0x100
[<ffffffff81003cb2>] do_syscall_64+0x62/0x110
[<ffffffff8174ae21>] return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x6a
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

...and here is the nfsidem command:

[jlayton@rawhide ~]$ cat /proc/1295/stack
[<ffffffff813953b7>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x17/0x30
[<ffffffff8121f65b>] filename_create+0x6b/0x150
[<ffffffff812204e4>] SyS_mkdir+0x44/0xe0
[<ffffffff81003cb2>] do_syscall_64+0x62/0x110
[<ffffffff8174ae21>] return_from_SYSCALL_64+0x0/0x6a
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff


I'll have to take off here in a bit so I won't be able to help much
until later, but all I was doing was running the cthon special tests
like so:

    $ ./server -p /export -s -N 100 tlielax

That makes a directory called "rawhide.test" (since the client's
hostname is "rawhide") and runs its tests in there. Then I ran this in
a different shell:

    $ while true; do ls -l /mnt/tlielax/rawhide.test ; done

Probably I should run this on a stock kernel just to see if there are
preexisting problems...

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux