Re: [PATCH 10/15] __d_add(): don't drop/regain ->d_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 02:09:09PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:

> Should the above be a new __d_instantiate_locked instead of open-coding 
> it?

Nope - it gets rehash mashed into it a few commits later.  In principle
we could try to fish the common helper out of it and __d_instantiate()
once the dust settles, but IMO there's not much point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux