On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I just talked to Al and Ted about the intended behavior of RLIMIT_CORE
> and we decided to address a wider audience to sort it out. The context
> is a patch series I sent out recently [1].
That series looks fine to me.
I could possibly see using a "no-holes" flag in addition to checking
the seek behavior to get accounting to be right for things like fat.
But this does seem to be a behavioural regression where the old
semantics made sense.
Al?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
