Re: [PATCH 0/3] writeback: minor tweaks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:43:50PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Three top level patches out of the writeback throttling patchset, that
> I think should make it into mainline. No functional changes in the
> first two patches, and the last patch just bumps reclaim/sync
> writeback to use WRITE_SYNC as a hint to the block layer.

Whatever happened to adding a new flag to indicate that write
requests can be throttled, rather than overloading WRITE_SYNC with
yet another (conflicting) meaning?

I've already pointed out the problems associated with tagging async,
bulk writes as synchronous writes so that a lower layer can avoid
throttling them. Please add a new flag for communicating whether
writes can be throttled to the block layer instead of reusing
WRITE_SYNC.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux