Re: [PATCH] vfs: avoid atomic f_pos accesses for non-seekable files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> On 05.04.16 at 16:19, <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Which /proc file is it that causes the read/write/lseek path to then
> presumably recurse into another read/write/lseek and cause a deadlock?
> Are there perhaps other cases we'd need to worry about?

It was /proc/xen/xenbus, which doesn't exist in the upstream kernel
(it's replacement is a miscdev at /dev/xen/xenbus there), hence I
didn't really consider it feasible to include that additional information
in the commit message. If you're nevertheless interested in the
details, I can try to reconstruct that from the report (I didn't
observe the problem myself, it was just reasonably straightforward
to find the cause of it), or I could point you at the (openSUSE) bug
report.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux