On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 05:59:54PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote: >> So we should use macro like current_hardirq_context() here? Or >> considering the two helpers introduced in my RFC: >> >> http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1455602265-16490-2-git-send-email-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx >> >> if you don't think that overkills ;-) > > I changed it into the below; since I did significant edits, let me know > if you disagree and / or want your name taken off. > Hi Peter, is there a place where you collect all those lockdep patches? I am a bit confused. Thanks. Regards, - Sedat - > --- > Subject: lockdep: Add task_irq_context() > From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:57:40 +0800 > > task_irq_context(): returns the encoded irq_context of the task, the > return value is encoded in the same as ->irq_context of held_lock. > Always return 0 if !(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) > > Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: sasha.levin@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455602265-16490-2-git-send-email-boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx > --- > kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c > +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c > @@ -2932,6 +2932,11 @@ static int mark_irqflags(struct task_str > return 1; > } > > +static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task) > +{ > + return 2 * !!task->hardirq_context + !!task->softirq_context; > +} > + > static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr, > struct held_lock *hlock) > { > @@ -2940,8 +2945,6 @@ static int separate_irq_context(struct t > /* > * Keep track of points where we cross into an interrupt context: > */ > - hlock->irq_context = 2*(curr->hardirq_context ? 1 : 0) + > - curr->softirq_context; > if (depth) { > struct held_lock *prev_hlock; > > @@ -2973,6 +2976,11 @@ static inline int mark_irqflags(struct t > return 1; > } > > +static inline unsigned int task_irq_context(struct task_struct *task) > +{ > + return 0; > +} > + > static inline int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr, > struct held_lock *hlock) > { > @@ -3241,6 +3249,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep > hlock->acquire_ip = ip; > hlock->instance = lock; > hlock->nest_lock = nest_lock; > + hlock->irq_context = task_irq_context(curr); > hlock->trylock = trylock; > hlock->read = read; > hlock->check = check; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
