On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:20:36AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > For now I'm not sure the infrastructure will stay in the generic code or > > in XFS, so for the first round I just wanted to ask for XFS feedback. > > QA over the past couple of days has indicatedno regressions, so I'm > going to seriously consider the multipage write code for the next > XFS merge. I'd be happy to also take fiemap code based on the same > iomap interfaces, especially if we can make it a generic, fully > functional fiemap implementation and use it in XFS, too. Ok. Bob, is the code going to be useful for your in gfs2 as-is? I'm torn a bit between adding it to common code because it actually is nicely abstracted and generic, and keepin it in XFS to make future changes easier (getting rid of buffer_heads is the big one here) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
