On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:07:33PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-22 at 13:32 -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:22:45PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > [Sorry for repost but I accidentally sent initial email without > > > patches] > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > this is my second attempt at DAX page fault locking rewrite. Things now > > > work reasonably well, it has survived full xfstests run on ext4. I > > > guess I need to do more mmap targetted tests to unveil issues. Guys > > > what do you used for DAX testing? > > > > I typically use xfstests for regression testing. If we can come up with > > new generally useful regression tests, especially ones concerning mmap > > races, that would be awesome. I guess it's just a choice between adding > > them somewhere in xfstests or somewhere else like with the unit tests in > > ndctl. > > Brian Boylston wrote a test for mmap race conditions and posted it before. > This test was very useful to fix the data corruption issue we had before. > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg49876.html > > If there is anything we can do to make this test useful as regression > tests? It's gplv2, so wrap it in a xfstests harness script and send it to fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
