[dhowells Cc'd]
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 05:04:19PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> [ 1422.292356] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 1422.292841] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 32603 at fs/namei.c:1587
> lookup_fast+0x3fa/0x450()
Huh? So you have
dentry = __d_lookup_rcu(parent, &nd->last, &seq);
returning non-NULL dentry, then
*inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
negative = d_is_negative(dentry);
if (read_seqcount_retry(&dentry->d_seq, seq))
return -ECHILD;
followed by by *inode == NULL and negative == true?
Nuts... OK, that removes vfsmounts from consideration, but... How the
fuck is that possible? We have
smp_rmb();
seq = &dentry->d_seq->sequence & ~1;
see that ->d_name and ->d_parent match what we are looking for,
then
*inode = dentry->d_inode;
type = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_flags);
smp_rmb();
negative = (type & DCACHE_ENTRY_TYPE) == DCACHE_MISS_TYPE;
smp_rmb();
if (dentry->d_seq->sequence != seq)
sod off
and observe *inode == NULL && !negative
Erm... What's to order ->d_inode and ->d_flags fetches there? David?
Looks like the barrier in d_is_negative() is on the wrong side of fetch.
Confused...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
