On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 04:51:24PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> > From: Milosz Tanski <milosz@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > New syscalls that take an flag argument. This change does not add any
> > specific flags.
>
> So, it looks like file systems that don't implement read_iter/write_iter
> won't get the flags argument passed along. I don't think that's a big
> deal, as such file systems seem to be in-memory file systems, but I
> think it warrants mention in the changelog.
Ok.
> Also, I think you added a stray newline below:
>
> > +static long do_compat_pwritev64(unsigned long fd,
> > const struct compat_iovec __user *vec,
> > - unsigned long vlen, loff_t pos)
> > + unsigned long vlen, loff_t pos, int flags)
> > {
> > struct fd f;
> > ssize_t ret;
> >
> > if (pos < 0)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > f = fdget(fd);
> > if (!f.file)
> > return -EBADF;
> > ret = -ESPIPE;
> > if (f.file->f_mode & FMODE_PWRITE)
> > - ret = compat_writev(f.file, vec, vlen, &pos);
> > + ret = compat_writev(f.file, vec, vlen, &pos, flags);
> > fdput(f);
> > return ret;
> > }
Yeah, no real need to add it, although the new version is defintively
more readable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
