From: chenjie <chenjie6@xxxxxxxxxx>
when we run fs_fsbase_t, some testcase like
write05 failed
write05 0 TINFO : Enter Block 1: test with bad fd
write05 1 TPASS : received EBADF as expected.
write05 0 TINFO : Exit Block 1
write05 0 TINFO : Enter Block 2: test with a bad address
write05 2 TFAIL : write() on an invalid buffer succeeded,
but should have failed
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: chenjie <chenjie6@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/dax.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index fc2e314..e1b1ff6 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -214,6 +214,11 @@ static ssize_t dax_io(struct inode *inode, struct iov_iter *iter,
max = min(pos + size, end);
}
+ if (unlikely(iov_iter_fault_in_readable(iter, max - pos))) {
+ retval = -EFAULT;
+ break;
+ }
+
if (iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE) {
len = copy_from_iter_pmem(dax.addr, max - pos, iter);
need_wmb = true;
--
1.8.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
