[BUG] inotify_add_watch/inotify_rm_watch loops trigger oom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Starting from v4.5-rc1 running inotify_add_watch/inotify_rm_watch in
loop could trigger OOM and system becomes unusuable. v4.4 kernel is fine
with the same stress test.

Reverting c510eff6beba ("fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead
of dedicated thread") on top of v4.5-rc3 passed the same test, seems
that this patch introduced some kind of memleak?

On v4.5-rc[1-3] the test program triggers oom within 10 minutes on my
test vm with 8G mem.  After reverting the commit in question the same vm
survived more than 1 hour stress test.

	./inotify <mnt>

I attached the test program and oom console log. If more information is
needed please let me know.

Thanks,
Eryu
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/inotify.h>

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	int notify_fd;
	int wd, ret;

	notify_fd = inotify_init();

	for (;;) {
		wd = inotify_add_watch(notify_fd, argv[1], IN_MODIFY | IN_CREATE | IN_DELETE );
		if (wd < 0) {
			perror("inotify_add_watch");
		}
		ret = inotify_rm_watch(notify_fd, wd);
		if (ret < 0) {
			perror("inotify_rm_watch");
		}
	}
out:
	close(notify_fd);

	return 0;
}

Attachment: inotify-oom.log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux