Re: computing drop-able caches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 11:11 -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On 02/10/2016 10:13 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 02/10/2016 10:04 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > [Linux_0:/]$ echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > > > [Linux_0:/]$ cat /proc/meminfo
> > > > MemTotal:        3977836 kB
> > > > MemFree:         1095012 kB
> > > > MemAvailable:    1434148 kB
> > > I suspect MemAvailable takes into account more than just the
> > > droppable
> > > caches. For instance, reclaimable slab is included, but I don't
> > > think
> > > drop_caches drops that part.
> > There's a bit for page cache and a bit for slab, see:
> > 
> > 	https://kernel.org/doc/Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt
> > 
> > 
> 
> Ok, then this looks like a defect then. I would think MemAvailable
> would 
> always be smaller then MemFree (after echo 3 > 
> /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches).. Unless there is something else be
> accounted 
> for that we aren't aware of.

echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches will only
drop unmapped page cache, IIRC

The system may still have a number of page
cache pages left that are mapped in processes,
but will be reclaimable if the VM needs the
memory for something else.

-- 
All rights reversed

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux