On Fri 05-02-16 12:05:19, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:28:05PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Add infrastructure for supporting get_nextdqblk() callback for VFS > > quotas. Translate the operation into a callback to appropriate > > filesystem and consequently to quota format callback. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > I'm a little confused here. What patchset is this dependent on? i.e. > what introduces the ->get_nextdqblk method? It depends on the patches Eric sent which introduce ->get_nextdqblk. > The patches I currently have in my XFS working tree introduce this > (quota: add new quotactl Q_XGETNEXTQUOTA) and everythign else is > dependent on this. I looked a coupl eof days ago and I wasnt' able > to find this in your tree. Yeah, I have this patch as well, I just didn't push out. > I'd much prefer that one of us publish a stable branch with just the > quotactl() infrastructure (i.e. commands and bits up to the > ->get_nextdqblk() callback) that we can then both base the different > subsystem implementations off, rather than one of us having to pull > in a whole tree of changes just to get the one commit we need... Sure, I have pushed out: 'getnextquota' branch into my tree git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs.git which contains the patches from Eric I carry (including fixups in comments other minor stuff I have found during final review). Can you please base XFS patches on top of this branch? Thanks! Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
