Re: vfs/xfs: directio updates to ease COW handling V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Christoph,

Can you explain a bit what you mean by easing COW handling?  Whenever I
see COW referenced near DIO, my mind always turns to g_u_p vs. fork.

Thanks!
Jeff

Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes:

> See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
>
> The first patch ensures ->end_io is always called for direct I/O requests
> that pass it in, even if there was a zero length write, or if an error
> occured.  The existing users have been updated to ignore it, but XFS
> will make use of it in the future, and a comment in ext4 suggests it
> might be useful for it as well.
>
> The other two simplify the XFS direct I/O code.
>
> Changes since V1:
>  - allow ->end_io to return errors
>  - a comment spelling fix
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux