On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 07:16:32PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 01/27/2016 07:13 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 12:38:14PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >>On 11/19/2015 10:25 PM, Jan Kara wrote: > >>>Assume a filesystem with 4KB blocks. When a file has size 1000 bytes and > >>>we issue direct IO read at offset 1024, blockdev_direct_IO() reads the > >>>tail of the last block and the logic for handling short DIO reads in > >>>dio_complete() results in a return value -24 (1000 - 1024) which > >>>obviously confuses userspace. > >>> > >>>Fix the problem by bailing out early once we sample i_size and can > >>>reliably check that direct IO read starts beyond i_size. > >>> > >>>Reported-by: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>Fixes: 9fe55eea7e4b444bafc42fa0000cc2d1d2847275 > >>>CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>While this patch made it into upstream, it did not appear in 4.3.4. Did it > >>slip through the proverbial cracks? Can it be queued for 4.3.5? > >There are over 400 patches right now in my queue that haven't made it > >into a 4.3.x kernel. > > Many projects would consider 400 patches a major release, and here they are > behind two dots... Look at the percentages, it's just a tiny drop in the bucket compared to what is hitting Linus's tree :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
