On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:43:45PM +0800, chenjie6@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: chenjie <chenjie6@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We show the pte: > *pte=01600000159c8fd3 > The page should be no_cache attr,it will be better. I disagree. What data do you have to show that the WC attribute would be better than WB? Even if we agree to that, this is the wrong place to change that attribute, so the patch is NAKed. But you need more than "it will be better". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
