Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > -static inline int d_unhashed(const struct dentry *dentry) > > +static inline bool d_unhashed(const struct dentry *dentry) > > { > > return hlist_bl_unhashed(&dentry->d_hash); > > } > > > > -static inline int d_unlinked(const struct dentry *dentry) > > +static inline bool d_unlinked(const struct dentry *dentry) > > { > > return d_unhashed(dentry) && !IS_ROOT(dentry); > > } > > > -static inline int simple_positive(struct dentry *dentry) > > +static inline bool simple_positive(struct dentry *dentry) > > { > > return d_really_is_positive(dentry) && !d_unhashed(dentry); > > } > > And these three are harmless, but completely pointless... gcc-5 does actually produce slightly smaller code when int returns are replaced by bools under some circumstances within the kernel. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html