On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:01:43PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Create a new ioctl to expose the block layer's newfound ability to
> issue either a zeroing discard, a WRITE SAME with a zero page, or a
> regular write with the zero page. This BLKZEROOUT2 ioctl takes
> {start, length, flags} as parameters. So far, the only flag available
> is to enable the zeroing discard part -- without it, the call invokes
> the old BLKZEROOUT behavior. start and length have the same meaning
> as in BLKZEROOUT.
>
> Furthermore, because BLKZEROOUT2 issues commands directly to the
> storage device, we must invalidate the page cache (as a regular
> O_DIRECT write would do) to avoid returning stale cache contents at a
> later time.
So does BLKZEROOUT. Seems like adding the cache invalidation should
be one patch and the ioctl another one. Otherwise this looks fine
except that I kinda hate BLKZEROOUT2 name, but can't come up with
anything better.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
