On 29/11/15 17:27, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 18/11/15 07:33, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >> >> >> On 17 November 2015 23:47:16 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 10:39:08 +0000 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/11/15 06:43, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 10 November 2015 21:12:37 GMT+00:00, Andrew Morton >>> <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 07:51:26 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> is this simple addition something you could still send on to >>> Linus >>>>>>> for this merge window? I would make my life easier to have it in >>>>>>> so I could start using it in patches for various trees in the >>> next >>>>>>> merge window. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's super late, but the configfs changes are obviously safe to >>>>>> existing code. >>>>>> >>>>>> What about the IIO changes? Will someone be merging them for >>> 4.5-rc1, >>>>>> or something else? >>>>> Yes. I'll take the IIO bits and ultimately they'll go through Greg >>> KH for the 4.5 >>>>> merge window. >>>>> >>>> Hi Andrew, >>>> >>>> Just taken a quick look at your mmotm list and see this ended up in >>> the >>>> mainline later group (fair enough given the timing!). >>>> As such shall we fall back to plan b) a special git branch pulled >>> into the trees >>>> of anyone who cares? >>>> >>>> I'll base such a tree on some obvious point in Linus' tree (either >>> 4.4 or 4.5-rc1) >>>> That way I can get the IIO stuff queued up asap and we can build on >>> that going >>>> forward during this cycle. >>> >>> I plan to send configfs-allow-dynamic-group-creation.patch to Linus >>> this week. I'll retain >>> >>> iio-core-introduce-iio-configfs-support.patch >>> iio-core-introduce-iio-software-triggers.patch >>> iio-core-introduce-iio-software-triggers-fix.patch >>> iio-trigger-introduce-iio-hrtimer-based-trigger.patch >>> iio-documentation-add-iio-configfs-documentation.patch >>> >>> with a view to dropping them once I see them turn up in linux-next. >> >> That's great. Thanks. > I've now applied the rest of the series to my local togreg branch and pushed > out as testing for the autobuilders to play with them. > > This branch will get rebased once Greg has picked up the previous PULL request. Now rebased - I also made a tiny change to take the iio_configfs_subsys structure static in response to a sparse warning - shout if I've done anything silly. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan >> >> Jonathan >> > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
