Rainer Weikusat <rw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: [...] > I'm sorry for this 13th hour request/ suggestion but while thinking > about a reply to Dmitry, it occurred to me that the restart_locked/ > sk_locked logic could be avoided by moving the test for this condition > in front of all the others while leaving the 'act on it' code at its > back, ie, reorganize unix_dgram_sendmsg such that it looks like this: [...] Just in case this is unclear on its own: If this was considered an improvement by someone other than me, I could supply either a "complete" patch with this re-arrangement or a cleanup delta patch changing the previous change. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
