On 11/16/2015 07:19 PM, Toshi Kani wrote: <> >> (Ok and we might have a slight problem with an NFIT only Node, where there >> is no volatile memory at all) > > The NFIT driver sets it to the closest on-line node (i.e. where regular memory > resides) in this case. > This is a real problem then. I know it used to be the same with type-12 pmem and we had real trouble with it on systems performance. Eventually one of your patches fixed it. We should fix this for NFIT, yes specially with ZONE_DEVICE and page support. It will hurt performance a lot. Eventually I'll get to it, again when NFIT becomes more relevant to us. <> > > Thanks, > -Toshi > Thanks Toshi Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html