As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not needed, remove it. Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@xxxxxxx> --- fs/hpfs/namei.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/hpfs/namei.c b/fs/hpfs/namei.c index 9e92c9c..ae4d5a1 100644 --- a/fs/hpfs/namei.c +++ b/fs/hpfs/namei.c @@ -227,8 +227,6 @@ static int hpfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode, de int err; if ((err = hpfs_chk_name(name, &len))) return err==-ENOENT ? -EINVAL : err; if (hpfs_sb(dir->i_sb)->sb_eas < 2) return -EPERM; - if (!new_valid_dev(rdev)) - return -EINVAL; hpfs_lock(dir->i_sb); err = -ENOSPC; fnode = hpfs_alloc_fnode(dir->i_sb, hpfs_i(dir)->i_dno, &fno, &bh); -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
