Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > That seems unlikely to work, so I suspect it gets a different definition. > If it uses this definition and it does work, we can probably use > > #if defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_MIXED_BREAKPOINTS_REGS) > > but that requires a comment explaining exactly why that works. Are you suggesting wrapping the entire construct in this within the UAPI header? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
