On 08/24/2015 03:17 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
On 08/24/2015 03:18 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 15:34 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 13:40 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Basically, we need to see what is the "common practice" here, and
follow it. This requires a small research. What would be the most
popular Linux FS which does not support direct I/O? Can we check
what
it does?
All popular filesystems seem to support direct IO.
That's the problem, application do not expect O_DIRECT to fail.
My intention was to do it like exofs:
Fair enough, thanks!
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@xxxxxxxxx>
Richard, you mention this was suggested by Dave, could you please pint
to the discussion, if possible?
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-August/060702.html
That's in a discussion I want to introduce ubifs into xfstests.
And Artem, I cc-ed that discussion to you, maybe you can find it in your
Inbox.
Yang
Artem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
