Am 21.08.2015 um 07:59 schrieb Dongsheng Yang: > On 08/04/2015 04:56 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote: >> Am 30.07.2015 um 07:48 schrieb Dongsheng Yang: >>> Currently, budget subsystem in ubifs are working on budgeting > > [...] >>> #endif >>> + unsigned int new_block_num; >>> + unsigned int dirtied_block_num; >> >> Why are these not under UBIFS_DEBUG? >> I like the overflow checks. > > Sorry for the late reply. > > I did not find the overflow checks in my reading. > Could you help to explain what kind of the check > is it? and why we define in different way with > UBIFS_DEBUG defined or not. AFAICT the idea is that you see it from the value from a crash dump. i.e. if new_page is > 2 an overflow happened. I don't know that Artem's original plan was. But we could also automate this checks. > And, Where did we define the UBIFS_DEBUG? I did not > get the design of this macro. :( You have define the macro yourself. Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
