On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:23 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> wrote: >> Since 0cbee99269 user-namespace pull, if a kdbusfs is mounted on a >> location that's not created with sysfs_create_mount_point the user >> namespaces are not allowed to mount their sysfs instances. >> >> Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> >> --- >> Applies on top of char-misc/kdbus a36324913. > > This does not apply on top of char-misc/kdbus. The tree lacks the > necessary commits. But yeah, it's required for 4.2. I'll keep it > starred until Greg back-merges 4.2. > > Anyway, this is still: Reviewed-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@xxxxxxxxx> Grumble. Keeping track of this is getting to be somewhat of a pain. Why isn't the kdbus-next branch already at 4.2? So if one was carrying the contents of char-misc/kdbus as stand-alone patches on top of 4.2-rc7, should your Reviewed-by count as "yes, apply this patch in that instance?" josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
