On 08/09/2015 05:24 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
Am 30.07.2015 um 07:48 schrieb Dongsheng Yang:Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ubifs/super.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c index 6ed35e2..06dd7af 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c @@ -2128,11 +2128,13 @@ static int ubifs_remount_fs(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) err = ubifs_remount_rw(c); if (err) return err; + dquot_resume(sb, -1); } else if (!c->ro_mount && (*flags & MS_RDONLY)) { if (c->ro_error) { ubifs_msg(c, "cannot re-mount R/O due to prior errors"); return -EROFS; } + dquot_suspend(sb, -1);Is it really safe to ignore the return values of both function?
Good point. I will do it. Thanx Yang
Beside of that, Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> Thanks, //richard .
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
