Put all the pieces of the acl transformation puzzle together for
computing a richacl which has the file masks "applied" so that the
standard nfsv4 access check algorithm can be used on the richacl.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/richacl_compat.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/richacl.h | 3 ++
2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/richacl_compat.c b/fs/richacl_compat.c
index d708603..e552c95 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_compat.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_compat.c
@@ -729,3 +729,113 @@ richacl_isolate_group_class(struct richacl_alloc *alloc)
}
return 0;
}
+
+/**
+ * __richacl_apply_masks - apply the file masks to all aces
+ * @alloc: acl and number of allocated entries
+ *
+ * Apply the owner mask to owner@ aces, the other mask to
+ * everyone@ aces, and the group mask to all other aces.
+ *
+ * The previous transformations have brought the acl into a
+ * form in which applying the masks will not lead to the
+ * accidental loss of permissions anymore.
+ */
+static int
+__richacl_apply_masks(struct richacl_alloc *alloc, kuid_t owner)
+{
+ struct richace *ace;
+
+ richacl_for_each_entry(ace, alloc->acl) {
+ unsigned int mask;
+
+ if (richace_is_inherit_only(ace) || !richace_is_allow(ace))
+ continue;
+ if (richace_is_owner(ace) ||
+ (richace_is_unix_user(ace) && uid_eq(owner, ace->e_id.uid)))
+ mask = alloc->acl->a_owner_mask;
+ else if (richace_is_everyone(ace))
+ mask = alloc->acl->a_other_mask;
+ else
+ mask = alloc->acl->a_group_mask;
+ if (richace_change_mask(alloc, &ace, ace->e_mask & mask))
+ return -1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * richacl_apply_masks - apply the masks to the acl
+ *
+ * Transform @acl so that the standard NFSv4 permission check algorithm (which
+ * is not aware of file masks) will compute the same access decisions as the
+ * richacl permission check algorithm (which looks at the acl and the file
+ * masks).
+ *
+ * This algorithm is split into several steps:
+ *
+ * - Move everyone@ aces to the end of the acl. This simplifies the other
+ * transformations, and allows the everyone@ allow ace at the end of the
+ * acl to eventually allow permissions to the other class only.
+ *
+ * - Propagate everyone@ permissions up the acl. This transformation makes
+ * sure that the owner and group class aces won't lose any permissions when
+ * we apply the other mask to the everyone@ allow ace at the end of the acl.
+ *
+ * - Apply the file masks to all aces.
+ *
+ * - Make sure the owner is granted the owner mask permissions.
+ *
+ * - Make sure everyone is granted the other mask permissions.
+ *
+ * - Make sure that the owner is not granted any permissions beyond the owner
+ * mask from group class aces or from everyone@.
+ *
+ * - Make sure that the group class is not granted any permissions from
+ * everyone@.
+ *
+ * The algorithm is exact except for richacls which cannot be represented as an
+ * acl alone: for example, given this acl:
+ *
+ * group@:rw::allow
+ *
+ * when file masks corresponding to mode 0600 are applied, the owner would only
+ * get rw access if he is a member of the owning group. This algorithm would
+ * produce an empty acl in this case. We fix this case by modifying
+ * richacl_permission() so that the group mask is always applied to group class
+ * aces. With this fix, the owner would not have any access (beyond the
+ * implicit permissions always granted to owners).
+ *
+ * NOTE: Depending on the acl and file masks, this algorithm can increase the
+ * number of aces by almost a factor of three in the worst case. This may make
+ * the acl too large for some purposes.
+ */
+int
+richacl_apply_masks(struct richacl **acl, kuid_t owner)
+{
+ if ((*acl)->a_flags & RICHACL_MASKED) {
+ struct richacl_alloc alloc = {
+ .acl = richacl_clone(*acl, GFP_KERNEL),
+ .count = (*acl)->a_count,
+ };
+ if (!alloc.acl)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ if (richacl_move_everyone_aces_down(&alloc) ||
+ richacl_propagate_everyone(&alloc) ||
+ __richacl_apply_masks(&alloc, owner) ||
+ richacl_set_owner_permissions(&alloc) ||
+ richacl_set_other_permissions(&alloc) ||
+ richacl_isolate_owner_class(&alloc) ||
+ richacl_isolate_group_class(&alloc)) {
+ richacl_put(alloc.acl);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ alloc.acl->a_flags &= ~(RICHACL_WRITE_THROUGH | RICHACL_MASKED);
+ richacl_put(*acl);
+ *acl = alloc.acl;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_apply_masks);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
index 565f12f..8723ec9 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
@@ -338,4 +338,7 @@ extern struct richacl *richacl_inherit(const struct richacl *, int);
extern int richacl_permission(struct inode *, const struct richacl *, int);
extern struct richacl *richacl_create(struct inode *, struct inode *);
+/* richacl_compat.c */
+extern int richacl_apply_masks(struct richacl **, kuid_t);
+
#endif /* __RICHACL_H */
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
