On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 12:48:00PM +0200, Matias Bj?rling wrote: > Only reason was to not duplicate the I/O submission/completion flow. > With the simple code at the moment, it is little to add. However, if > someone decides to put backing store, simulation, etc. into it, then it > should properly go into another module. > > Do you want me to move it into a new driver for this patchset? I'd prefer to have it separate unless there's a good reason to merge it into null_blk. From your above descriptions it sounds like it really should be separate. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html