Hey Jeff, On 07/13/2015 06:45 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > The following changes since commit b9243b5a5d2da4eb0a54950f4e2d6272863b48be: > > Merge branch 'parisc-4.2-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/deller/parisc-linux (2015-07-10 16:54:37 -0700) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.samba.org/jlayton/linux.git tags/locks-v4.2-1 > > for you to fetch changes up to ee296d7c5709440f8abd36b5b65c6b3e388538d9: > > locks: inline posix_lock_file_wait and flock_lock_file_wait (2015-07-13 06:29:11 -0400) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > File locking related changes for v4.2 (pile #1) > > I had thought that I was going to get away without a pull request this > cycle. There was a NFSv4 file locking problem that cropped up that I > tried to fix in the NFSv4 code alone, but that fix has turned out to be > problematic. These patches fix this in the correct way. > > Note that this touches some NFSv4 code as well. Ordinarily I'd wait for > Trond to ACK this, but he's on holiday right now and the bug is rather > nasty. So I suggest we merge this and if he raises issues with it we > can sort it out when he gets back. This looks reasonable to me, especially since Bruce and Dane have commented that it fixes their bugs. Is my acked-by good enough? :) Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Jeff Layton (5): > Revert "nfs: take extra reference to fl->fl_file when running a LOCKU operation" > locks: have flock_lock_file take an inode pointer instead of a filp > locks: new helpers - flock_lock_inode_wait and posix_lock_inode_wait > nfs4: have do_vfs_lock take an inode pointer > locks: inline posix_lock_file_wait and flock_lock_file_wait > > fs/locks.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 18 ++++++++---------- > include/linux/fs.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-) > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
