On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:26:27PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > That's a good point. Thanks for explanation. Maybe add a comment like: > /* > * We use use this seemingly complicated 'for' loop so that 'break' and > * 'continue' continue to work as expected. > */ This kinda feel superflous for me. This is something true for all iteration wrappers which falls within the area of well-established convention, I think. If it's doing something weird like combining if-else clause to do post-conditional processing, sure, but this is really kinda standard. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
