On Fri 22-05-15 17:13:48, Tejun Heo wrote:
> There are several places in fs/fs-writeback.c which queues
> wb_writeback_work without checking whether the target wb
> (bdi_writeback) has dirty inodes or not. The only thing
> wb_writeback_work does is writing back the dirty inodes for the target
> wb and queueing a work item for a clean wb is essentially noop. There
> are some side effects such as bandwidth stats being updated and
> triggering tracepoints but these don't affect the operation in any
> meaningful way.
>
> This patch makes all writeback_inodes_sb_nr() and sync_inodes_sb()
> skip wb_queue_work() if the target bdi is clean. Also, it moves
> dirtiness check from wakeup_flusher_threads() to
> __wb_start_writeback() so that all its callers benefit from the check.
>
> While the overhead incurred by scheduling a noop work isn't currently
> significant, the overhead may be higher with cgroup writeback support
> as we may end up issuing noop work items to a lot of clean wb's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
Honza
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index c98d392..921a9e4 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -189,6 +189,9 @@ static void __wb_start_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
> {
> struct wb_writeback_work *work;
>
> + if (!wb_has_dirty_io(wb))
> + return;
> +
> /*
> * This is WB_SYNC_NONE writeback, so if allocation fails just
> * wakeup the thread for old dirty data writeback
> @@ -1215,11 +1218,8 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads(long nr_pages, enum wb_reason reason)
> nr_pages = get_nr_dirty_pages();
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - list_for_each_entry_rcu(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list) {
> - if (!bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi))
> - continue;
> + list_for_each_entry_rcu(bdi, &bdi_list, bdi_list)
> __wb_start_writeback(&bdi->wb, nr_pages, false, reason);
> - }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
>
> @@ -1512,11 +1512,12 @@ void writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super_block *sb,
> .nr_pages = nr,
> .reason = reason,
> };
> + struct backing_dev_info *bdi = sb->s_bdi;
>
> - if (sb->s_bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
> + if (!bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi) || bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
> return;
> WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
> - wb_queue_work(&sb->s_bdi->wb, &work);
> + wb_queue_work(&bdi->wb, &work);
> wait_for_completion(&done);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_nr);
> @@ -1594,13 +1595,14 @@ void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> .reason = WB_REASON_SYNC,
> .for_sync = 1,
> };
> + struct backing_dev_info *bdi = sb->s_bdi;
>
> /* Nothing to do? */
> - if (sb->s_bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
> + if (!bdi_has_dirty_io(bdi) || bdi == &noop_backing_dev_info)
> return;
> WARN_ON(!rwsem_is_locked(&sb->s_umount));
>
> - wb_queue_work(&sb->s_bdi->wb, &work);
> + wb_queue_work(&bdi->wb, &work);
> wait_for_completion(&done);
>
> wait_sb_inodes(sb);
> --
> 2.4.0
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
